Verizon, Vonage and patent madness

via sometimes snarky tech blog Engadget, the madness that is the technology patent system lately:

Verizon's patents may be illegitimate. Apparently the two patents in question, 6,104,711 (filed March 6, 1997) and 6,282,574 (filed February 24, 2000) may themselves use technology openly discussed and published by VocalTec back in 1996. In fact, it may also indirectly include technology input from the likes of IBM, Microsoft, Intel, Nortel, etc. made during the VoIP Forum in 1996, with the businesses' original intentions that this tech be used in future open standards.

Can anything be proved here that would give Vonage a get out of jail free card? Well, we're certainly not lawyers (we'll defer to the legally-inclined in our audience), but already this patent he-said she-said is smacking a bit of RIM and NTP's fracas, and we all know how ugly that wound up being for the BlackBerry maker.

This information is a actually an update to a post which dicusses Voange's pesimistic outlook about being able to find and implement a work around to the Verizon-patented technology.

I certainly hope that Verizon's patents are found to be based upon earlier open standards, and therefore unenforceable, but the madness of each of these tiny incremental changes in technology - sometimes as simple as a code rewrite - being considered an entirely new method or process deserving of patent protection.

Not only does Congress need to address the net neutrality issue in a big picture way, but the patent process and United States Patent and Trademark Office needs a thorough review to determine if their methods and processes are working as well as they should.




You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.